Theodore Cobbs v. Warden Leroy Cartledge
THEODORE COBBS |
WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE |
16-7566 |
November 9, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Theodore Cobbs v. Warden Leroy Cartledge |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406417675 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999977196-2] Originating case number: 9:15-cv-03038-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000032015]. Mailed to: Theodore Cobbs PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 430 Oaklawn Road Pelzer, SC 29669-0000. [16-7566] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Theodore Cobbs v. Warden Leroy Cartledge | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: THEODORE COBBS | |
Represented By: | Theodore Cobbs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE | |
Represented By: | Melody Jane Brown |
Represented By: | Donald John Zelenka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.