Carol Innes v. Barclays Bank PLC USA
| CAROL FORESTER INNES |
| BARCLAYS BANK PLC USA STAFF PENSION PLAN COMMITTEE |
| 17-1196 |
| February 13, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Carol Innes v. Barclays Bank PLC USA |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406713927
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00018-GEC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000169203]. [17-1196]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Carol Innes v. Barclays Bank PLC USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: CAROL FORESTER INNES | |
| Represented By: | Joseph William Wright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: BARCLAYS BANK PLC USA STAFF PENSION PLAN COMMITTEE | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Elaine Ivey |
| Represented By: | Kiran H. Mehta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
