In re: Vivek Shah
In re: VIVEK SHAH |
17-1294 |
March 7, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406575573 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000037364-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000080126-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000045410-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000080122-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cr-00172-1,5:13-cr-00127-1,5:15-cv-07542 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105074]. Mailed to: Vivek Shah. [17-1294] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Vivek Shah | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: VIVEK SHAH | |
Represented By: | Vivek Shah |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Represented By: | Candace Haley Bunn |
Represented By: | R. Booth Goodwin |
Represented By: | Steven Robert Ruby |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.