Christopher Peek v. Suntrust Bank Mortgage, Inc.
CHRISTOPHER EARL PEEK |
SUNTRUST BANK MORTGAGE, INC., In subsidiaries , affiliates, and Assigns, BWW Law Group, LLC |
17-1330 |
March 15, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Christopher Peek v. Suntrust Bank Mortgage, Inc. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406615180 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01415-LMB-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000123622]. Mailed to: Christopher Earl Peek. [17-1330] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Christopher Peek v. Suntrust Bank Mortgage, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: CHRISTOPHER EARL PEEK | |
Represented By: | Christopher Earl Peek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: SUNTRUST BANK MORTGAGE, INC., In subsidiaries , affiliates, and Assigns, BWW Law Group, LLC | |
Represented By: | Maurice Francis Mullins |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Scott Turner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.