Adams Housing, LLC v. City of Salisbury, Maryland
| ADAMS HOUSING, LLC |
| CITY OF SALISBURY, MARYLAND |
| 17-2044 |
| September 7, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Adams Housing, LLC v. City of Salisbury, Maryland |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406899995
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01011-JFM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000255918]. [17-2044]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Adams Housing, LLC v. City of Salisbury, Maryland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: ADAMS HOUSING, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Luke Americus Rommel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CITY OF SALISBURY, MARYLAND | |
| Represented By: | Victoria M. Shearer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
