Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. The City of Baltimore
| BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY |
| CITY OF BALTIMORE |
| 17-6039 |
| January 12, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. The City of Baltimore |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406541127
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for leave to file [1000012777-2] Originating case number: 8:16-cv-03879-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000089140]. Mailed to: Boaz Pleasant-Bey. [17-6039]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. The City of Baltimore | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY | |
| Represented By: | Boaz Pleasant-Bey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CITY OF BALTIMORE | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
