US v. Orlando Black
Petitioner - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant: ORLANDO BLACK
Case Number: 17-6091
Filed: January 26, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 26, 2017 US v. Orlando Black

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406540958 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02180-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000089078]. Mailed to: Orlando Black. [17-6091]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Orlando Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jennifer Dee Dannels
Represented By: Robert J. Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: ORLANDO BLACK
Represented By: Orlando Black
Represented By: Walter C. Holton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?