William Neal, Jr. v. Faye Daniels
WILLIAM JACKSON NEAL, JR. |
FAYE DANIELS |
17-6165 |
February 10, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
William Neal, Jr. v. Faye Daniels |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406624412 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Denying Motion to correc the record [1000052418-2]; Deny Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000035954-2]; Deny Motion to supplement [1000025923-2]; Deny Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [1000022691-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02153-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000127841]. Mailed to: William Neal. [17-6165] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Neal, Jr. v. Faye Daniels | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: WILLIAM JACKSON NEAL, JR. | |
Represented By: | William Jackson Neal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: FAYE DANIELS | |
Represented By: | Clarence Joe DelForge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.