Reginald Spellman v. Warden of Kershaw Corr Inst
| REGINALD BRYAN SPELLMAN |
| WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION |
| 17-6255 |
| March 1, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Reginald Spellman v. Warden of Kershaw Correctional |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406577839
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed denying certificate of appealability. Originating case number: 9:16-cv-01332-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000106094]. Mailed to: Reginald Spellman. [17-6255]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Reginald Spellman v. Warden of Kershaw Corr Inst | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: REGINALD BRYAN SPELLMAN | |
| Represented By: | Reginald Bryan Spellman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION | |
| Represented By: | Caroline M. Scrantom |
| Represented By: | Donald John Zelenka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
