US v. Michael Paul Puzey
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY, a/k/a Big Pete |
17-6316 |
March 10, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406617168 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000079494-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [1000082452-2]; granting Motion for leave to file a reply to the Government's objection to motion for release [1000094625-2] Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00057-GMG-RWT-16,3:00-cr-00064-GMG-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000124497]. Mailed to: Michael Paul Puzey. [17-6316] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Michael Paul Puzey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Paul Thomas Camilletti |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY, a/k/a Big Pete | |
Represented By: | Michael Paul Puzey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.