David Crawley v. John Comb
| DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY |
| JOHN C. COMBS, Assistant Warden - Wallens Ridge State Prison |
| 17-6386 |
| March 22, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406617244
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000062980-2] Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00172-MFU-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000124528]. Mailed to: David Edward Crawley. [17-6386]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Crawley v. John Comb | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID EDWARD CRAWLEY | |
| Represented By: | David Edward Crawley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: JOHN C. COMBS, Assistant Warden - Wallens Ridge State Prison | |
| Represented By: | John Michael Parsons |
| Represented By: | Richard Carson Vorhis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
