US v. Theron Thompson
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THERON JERMAINE THOMPSON, a/k/a Freak
Case Number:
17-6639
Filed:
May 18, 2017
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit:
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Date Filed | Description |
|---|---|
| September 28, 2017 | US v. Theron Thompson |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| September 28, 2017 | 406701067 |
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--updating certificate of appealability status Originating case number: 4:08-cr-00004-FL-1,4:11-cv-00074-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000163316]. Mailed to: Theron Jermaine Thompson. [17-6639]
|
| Search for this case: US v. Theron Thompson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | William Ellis Boyle |
| Represented By: | Joshua Bryan Royster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: THERON JERMAINE THOMPSON, a/k/a Freak | |
| Represented By: | Theron Jermaine Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
