US v. Travis Deshon McNeil
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
TRAVIS DESHON MCNEIL |
17-6708 |
June 2, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406627557 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000101318-2] Originating case number: 5:11-cr-00271-H-1,5:13-cv-00787-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000129134]. Mailed to: Travis Deshon McNeil FMC BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER P. O. Box 1600 Butner, NC 27509-0000. [17-6708] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Travis Deshon McNeil | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Rudy E. Renfer |
Represented By: | Seth Morgan Wood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: TRAVIS DESHON MCNEIL | |
Represented By: | Travis Deshon McNeil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.