US v. Khalif Mujahid
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| KHALIF ABDUL QAWI MUJAHID, a/k/a Keith Eugene Gaffney, a/k/a Fly, a/k/a Slim |
| 18-6050 |
| January 18, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406906930
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:95-cr-00053-LMB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000259144]. Mailed to: Khalif Abdul Qawi Mujahid. [18-6050]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Khalif Mujahid | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas More Hollenhorst |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: KHALIF ABDUL QAWI MUJAHID, a/k/a Keith Eugene Gaffney, a/k/a Fly, a/k/a Slim | |
| Represented By: | Khalif Abdul Qawi Mujahid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
