Mark Lowe v. Commonwealth of VA DOC
| MARK MADISON LOWE |
| COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 18-6090 |
| January 26, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406991539
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed on original record [1000241816-2]; denying Motion for certificate of appealability [1000236534-2] Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00292-RCY. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000297673]. Mailed to: M. Lowe. [18-6090]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mark Lowe v. Commonwealth of VA DOC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: MARK MADISON LOWE | |
| Represented By: | Mark Madison Lowe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Craig Stallard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
