US v. Michael A. Marshall
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MICHAEL ANTOINE MARSHALL |
| 18-6222 |
| March 9, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406991267
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for certificate of appealability [1000270113-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cr-00261-FDW-1, 3:17-cv-00573-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000297546]. Mailed to: Marshall. [18-6222]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Michael A. Marshall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Bain-Creed |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Margaret Greenough |
| Represented By: | Kevin Zolot |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: MICHAEL ANTOINE MARSHALL | |
| Represented By: | Michael Antoine Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
