US v. Bryan Samuel
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: BRYAN CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL
Case Number: 18-6374
Filed: April 12, 2018
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 407083125 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00351-TSE-1,1:17-cv-01432-TSE. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000339347]. Mailed to: Elizabeth Eriksen, Bryan Samuel. [18-6374]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Bryan Samuel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Christopher John Catizone
Represented By: Elizabeth Nash Eriksen
Represented By: G. Zachary Terwilliger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: BRYAN CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL
Represented By: Bryan Christopher Samuel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?