Harry Brantley v. Gene Johnson
| HARRY BRANTLEY |
| GENE JOHNSON, Director for the VA Department of Corrections |
| 18-6542 |
| May 14, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
407073061
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000312855-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000312844-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00661-GBL-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000334911]. Mailed to: Harry Brantley. [18-6542]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harry Brantley v. Gene Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: HARRY BRANTLEY | |
| Represented By: | Harry Brantley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: GENE JOHNSON, Director for the VA Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Craig Stallard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
