R. Acosta v. Benefits Consulting Group
MARILYN WARD, CHIMES INTERNATIONAL, LTD., MARTIN LAMPNER, ALBERT BUSSONE, GARY BECKMAN, FCE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS, INC., THE CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INCORPORATED, CHIMES D.C. INC. HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN and STEPHEN PORTER |
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor |
BENEFITS CONSULTING GROUP and JEFFREY RAMSEY |
19-1122 |
January 31, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER filed [1000471871] granting Motion to suspend [ # 7 ] Copies to all parties. [19-1122] RHS [Entered: 03/07/2019 11:43 AM] |
Filing 7 MOTION by R. Alexander Acosta to suspend Briefing Order. Date and method of service: 03/06/2019 ecf. [1000471476] [19-1122] Isidro Mariscal [Entered: 03/06/2019 06:08 PM] |
Filing 6 MOTION by R. Alexander Acosta to place case in abeyance.. Date and method of service: 02/11/2019 ecf. [1000455681] [19-1122] Isidro Mariscal [Entered: 02/11/2019 05:21 PM] |
Filing 5 BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Opening Brief and Appendix due 03/20/2019. Response Brief due 04/19/2019 [19-1122] RHS [Entered: 02/08/2019 12:32 PM] |
Filing 4 DOCKETING STATEMENT by R. Alexander Acosta. [19-1122] Isidro Mariscal [Entered: 02/07/2019 05:35 PM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Isidro Mariscal for R. Alexander Acosta. [1000452617] [19-1122] Isidro Mariscal [Entered: 02/06/2019 11:23 AM] |
Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03315-RDB.. [19-1122] RHS [Entered: 01/31/2019 11:58 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03315-RDB. Case manager: RSewell. [19-1122] RHS [Entered: 01/31/2019 11:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.