Cynthia Fisher v. Walgreen Co.
| WALGREENS and WALGREEN CO. |
| DR. CYNTHIA FISHER |
| 19-1470 |
| May 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER filed [1000520656] granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ] Number of days granted: 30. Fee/IFP/CJA 23 due 06/28/2019, Informal Opening Brief due 06/28/2019 Copies to all parties. [19-1470] RHS [Entered: 05/29/2019 12:11 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Cynthia Fisher to extend filing time for fee and informal opening brief until 7/8/2019. Date and method of service: 05/28/2019 US mail. [1000520633] [19-1470] RHS [Entered: 05/29/2019 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS by Walgreens. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1000512550] [19-1470] Kelly Hughes [Entered: 05/14/2019 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Kelly S. Hughes for Walgreens. [1000512548] [19-1470] Kelly Hughes [Entered: 05/14/2019 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 05/28/2019 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-1470] RHS [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Cynthia Fisher - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 05/31/2019 Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00225-MOC-WCM. Mailed to: Cynthia Fisher. [19-1470] RHS [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00225-MOC-WCM. Case manager: RSewell. [19-1470] RHS [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
