Charles Hill v. Southeastern Medical Clinic
| ROBERT L. HOLLINGSWORTH and SOUTHEASTERN MEDICAL CLINIC, Red Springs |
| CHARLES ALFRED HILL |
| 19-1560 |
| May 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Charles Hill v. Southeastern Medical Clinic |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Affirmed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00158-D. Entered on Docket Date: 07/18/2019. [1000549426] Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Charles Hill. [19-1560] AW [Entered: 07/18/2019 07:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00158-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000549424]. Mailed to: Charles Hill. [19-1560] AW [Entered: 07/18/2019 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Charles Alfred Hill. [19-1560] AW [Entered: 06/03/2019 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00158-D. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-1560] AW [Entered: 05/23/2019 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Charles Hill. Informal Opening Brief due 06/17/2019 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-1560] AW [Entered: 05/23/2019 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00158-D. Case manager: AWalker. [19-1560] AW [Entered: 05/23/2019 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
