In re: Raymond Chestnut
| In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT |
| 19-1595 |
| June 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER filed [1000523764] deferring action on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Raymond Edward Chestnut [4]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Raymond Chestnut. [19-1595] RE [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:16 AM]
|
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:19-hc-02068-FL. Mailed to: Raymond Chestnut. [19-1595] RE [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-hc-02068-FL. Case manager: REdwards. [19-1595] RE [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 4 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Raymond Edward Chestnut. [19-1595] RE [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 3 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Raymond Edward Chestnut. [19-1595] RE [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Raymond Chestnut | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT | |
| Represented By: | Raymond Edward Chestnut |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
