Curtis Moorer v. Perry Luthi
| CURTIS GLENN MOORER, a/k/a Curtis G. Moorer |
| PERRY S. LUTHI and NEW CAROLINA MORTGAGE |
| 19-1620 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 6:18-cv-03564-RBH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-1620] RE [Entered: 07/08/2019 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Curtis Glenn Moorer. [19-1620] RE [Entered: 07/08/2019 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 6 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 07/08/2019. [19-1620] RE [Entered: 06/24/2019 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 6:18-cv-03564-RBH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-1620] RE [Entered: 06/24/2019 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Curtis Moorer. Informal Opening Brief due 07/08/2019. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-1620] RE [Entered: 06/12/2019 08:44 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER filed [1000528716] deferring action on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [2]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Curtis Moorer. [19-1620] RE [Entered: 06/12/2019 08:42 AM]
|
| Filing 2 IFP APPLICATION transferred from district court (court access only). [19-1620] RE [Entered: 06/12/2019 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 6:18-cv-03564-RBH. Case manager: REdwards. [19-1620] RE [Entered: 06/12/2019 08:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
