EEOC v. Michael Buesgens
ADVANCED HOME CARE, INC and ADVANCED HOME CARE, INC. |
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
MICHAEL BUESGENS, a/k/a Nevada Smith |
19-1789 |
July 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00646-TDS-JEP. Mailed to: Michael Buesgens. [19-1789] RHS [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:54 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER filed [1000596433] dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Michael Buesgens. [19-1789] RHS [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:52 PM] |
Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Michael Buesgens re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. [19-1789] RHS [Entered: 09/09/2019 03:39 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Philip M. Kovnat for EEOC. [1000558226] [19-1789] Philip Kovnat [Entered: 07/31/2019 04:46 PM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 08/23/2019 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-1789] RHS [Entered: 07/30/2019 08:30 AM] |
Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Michael Buesgens - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 08/29/2019 Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00646-TDS-JEP.. [19-1789] RHS [Entered: 07/30/2019 08:28 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00646-TDS-JEP. Case manager: RSewell. [19-1789] RHS [Entered: 07/30/2019 08:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.