In re: Raymond Chestnut
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray
Case Number: 19-1796
Filed: July 30, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 25, 2019 In re: Raymond Chestnut

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2019 Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1.. [19-1796] RHS [Entered: 07/31/2019 11:22 AM]
July 30, 2019 Filing 3 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Raymond Edward Chestnut. [19-1796] RHS [Entered: 07/30/2019 04:24 PM]
July 30, 2019 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1. Case manager: RSewell. [19-1796] RHS [Entered: 07/30/2019 04:18 PM]
July 26, 2019 Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Raymond Edward Chestnut. [19-1796] RHS [Entered: 07/30/2019 04:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Raymond Chestnut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray
Represented By: Raymond Edward Chestnut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?