In Re: Michael Carter
| In re: MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze |
| 19-1800 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Docket correction requested from Michael Kenny Carter. Mailed to: M. Carter. [19-1800] CT [Entered: 07/31/2019 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00351-JMC-1, 3:18-cv-02707-JMC. Mailed to: M. Carter. [19-1800] CT [Entered: 07/31/2019 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Michael Kenny Carter - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 08/15/2019. Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00351-JMC-1, 3:18-cv-02707-JMC. [19-1800] CT [Entered: 07/31/2019 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00351-JMC-1, 3:18-cv-02707-JMC. Case manager: CathyHerb. [19-1800] CT [Entered: 07/31/2019 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Michael Kenny Carter. [19-1800] CT [Entered: 07/31/2019 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Michael Carter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze | |
| Represented By: | Michael Kenny Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
