In Re: Kevin Green
| In re: KEVIN MICHAEL GREEN |
| 19-1860 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Docket correction requested from Kevin Michael Green. Mailed to: K. Green. [19-1860] CT [Entered: 08/09/2019 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01293. Mailed to: K. Green. [19-1860] CT [Entered: 08/09/2019 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Kevin Michael Green - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 08/26/2019. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01293. Mailed to: K. Green. [19-1860] CT [Entered: 08/09/2019 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01293. Case manager: CathyHerb. [19-1860] CT [Entered: 08/09/2019 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Kevin Michael Green. [19-1860] CT [Entered: 08/09/2019 12:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Kevin Green | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: KEVIN MICHAEL GREEN | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Michael Green |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
