In re: Michael Casdorph
In re: MICHAEL JARRETT CASDORPH |
19-1902 |
August 21, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Docket correction requested from Michael Jarrett Casdorph. Mailed to: Michael Jarrett Casdorph. [19-1902] KS [Entered: 08/21/2019 07:52 AM] |
Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00056-JPB-JPM. Mailed to: Michael Jarrett Casdorph. [19-1902] KS [Entered: 08/21/2019 07:48 AM] |
Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Michael Jarrett Casdorph - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 09/05/2019. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00056-JPB-JPM. Mailed to: Michael Jarrett Casdorph. [19-1902] KS [Entered: 08/21/2019 07:45 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00056-JPB-JPM. Case manager: KStump. [19-1902] KS [Entered: 08/21/2019 07:43 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Michael Jarrett Casdorph. [19-1902] KS [Entered: 08/21/2019 07:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Michael Casdorph | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL JARRETT CASDORPH | |
Represented By: | Michael Jarrett Casdorph |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.