Mark Grant v. The City of Roanoke, Virginia
Defendant / Appellee: THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK T. GRANT
Case Number: 19-1999
Filed: September 13, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 29, 2020 Mark Grant v. The City of Roanoke, Virginia

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2019 Filing 11 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Mark T. Grant to Motion to dismiss appeal [ # 8 ]. [19-1999] DL [Entered: 10/18/2019 01:48 PM]
October 3, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE ISSUED to Mark T. Grant requesting response to Motion to dismiss appeal [ # 8 ]. Response due: 10/17/2019.[1000600322]. Mailed to: Mark T. Grant. [19-1999] MH [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:54 PM]
October 3, 2019 Filing 9 Memorandum referencing David L. Collins [ # 8 ] Motion by The City of Roanoke, Virginia. [1000600267] [19-1999] David Collins [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:26 PM]
October 3, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION by The City of Roanoke, Virginia David L. Collins to dismiss appeal [8]. Date and method of service: 10/03/2019 US mail. [1000600252] [19-1999] David Collins [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:20 PM]
October 3, 2019 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David L. Collins for The City of Roanoke, Virginia. [1000600238] [19-1999] David Collins [Entered: 10/03/2019 02:14 PM]
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Mark T. Grant. [19-1999] DL [Entered: 09/23/2019 04:21 PM]
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS by Mark T. Grant. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000592785] [19-1999] DL [Entered: 09/23/2019 04:20 PM]
September 13, 2019 Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00007-MFU. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-1999] CH [Entered: 09/13/2019 11:19 AM]
September 13, 2019 Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Mark Grant and David Collins. Informal Opening Brief due 10/07/2019. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-1999] CH [Entered: 09/13/2019 11:14 AM]
September 13, 2019 Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Mark T. Grant - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/15/2019. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00007-MFU. Mailed to: Mark Grant and David Collins. [19-1999]--[Edited 09/13/2019 by CH] CH [Entered: 09/13/2019 11:07 AM]
September 13, 2019 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00007-MFU. Case manager: CHalupa. [19-1999] CH [Entered: 09/13/2019 10:51 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mark Grant v. The City of Roanoke, Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Callaghan
Represented By: David Lee Collins
Represented By: David L. Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARK T. GRANT
Represented By: Mark T. Grant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?