Richard Harrell v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD LEE HARRELL
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 19-2063
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 18 Receipt of paper copy of ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD adopted as APPENDIX filed at [17] by Richard Lee Harrell. Total number of volumes: [2]. Total number of pages in all volumes: [642]. Sufficient: Yes. Number of copies: [1]. Received by clerk date: 11/18/2019. [1000631032] [19-2063] TW [Entered: 11/21/2019 02:06 PM]
November 15, 2019 Filing 17 Administrative record [ # 5 ] adopted as appendix by Richard Lee Harrell. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date paper copies mailed dispatched or delivered to court: 11/15/2019. [1000626848] [19-2063] John Goss [Entered: 11/15/2019 10:11 AM]
November 14, 2019 Filing 16 Corrected FULL ELECTRONIC APPENDIX and full paper appendix by Richard Lee Harrell and Andrew Saul. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date paper copies mailed dispatched or delivered to court: 11/15/2019. [1000626579] [19-2063] John Goss [Entered: 11/14/2019 05:02 PM]
November 14, 2019 Filing 15 Corrected BRIEF by Richard Lee Harrell in electronic and paper format. Type of Brief: OPENING. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date Paper Copies Mailed, Dispatched, or Delivered to Court: 11/15/2019. [1000626576] [19-2063] John Goss [Entered: 11/14/2019 04:58 PM]
November 12, 2019 Filing 14 Docket correction requested from Richard Lee Harrell. [19-2063] CB [Entered: 11/12/2019 11:16 AM]
November 11, 2019 Filing 13 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) Joint FULL ELECTRONIC APPENDIX and full paper appendix by Richard Lee Harrell. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date paper copies mailed dispatched or delivered to court: 11/13/2019. [1000623572] [19-2063]--[Edited 11/21/2019 by CB See Corrected Appendix at ECF 16.] John Goss [Entered: 11/11/2019 04:12 PM]
November 11, 2019 Filing 12 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) BRIEF by Richard Lee Harrell in electronic and paper format. Type of Brief: OPENING. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date Paper Copies Mailed, Dispatched, or Delivered to Court: 11/13/2019. [1000623570] [19-2063]--[Edited 11/21/2019 by CB - See Corrected Opening Brief at ECF 15.] John Goss [Entered: 11/11/2019 04:11 PM]
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER filed [1000602664] granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis [10]. Copies to all parties. [19-2063] TW [Entered: 10/08/2019 10:47 AM]
October 7, 2019 Filing 10 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Richard Lee Harrell. [19-2063] John Goss [Entered: 10/07/2019 06:07 PM]
October 7, 2019 Filing 9 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Richard Lee Harrell. [19-2063] John Goss [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:59 PM]
October 7, 2019 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS by Richard Lee Harrell. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000601902] [19-2063] John Goss [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:58 PM]
October 7, 2019 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by John O. Goss for Richard Lee Harrell. [1000601900] [19-2063] John Goss [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:57 PM]
October 2, 2019 Filing 6 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Opening Brief and Appendix due 11/12/2019. Response Brief due 12/11/2019. [19-2063] CB [Entered: 10/02/2019 03:26 PM]
October 2, 2019 Filing 5 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in electronic format by Andrew Saul. Method of service: ECF service on counsel. [19-2063] Jennifer Flurry [Entered: 10/02/2019 02:20 PM]
October 1, 2019 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jennifer E. Flurry for Andrew Saul. [1000598387] [19-2063] Jennifer Flurry [Entered: 10/01/2019 01:46 PM]
October 1, 2019 Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD requested (counseled cases). Was administrative record filed in electronic form in district court? No. Administrative Record (Social Security) due 10/15/2019. [19-2063]--[Edited 10/01/2019 by CB to reflect that administrative record filed in paper form.] CB [Entered: 10/01/2019 11:30 AM]
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to John Goss - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/31/2019. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00353-RAJ-LRL. [19-2063] CB [Entered: 10/01/2019 11:29 AM]
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1000598146-2 ] social security case. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00353-RAJ-LRL. [19-2063] CB [Entered: 10/01/2019 11:25 AM]
October 1, 2019 Social Security case docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00353-RAJ-LRL. Date notice of appeal filed: 09/27/2019. Case manager: CBennett. [19-2063] CB [Entered: 10/01/2019 11:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richard Harrell v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD LEE HARRELL
Represented By: John Osborne Goss Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Jennifer E. Flurry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?