Christopher Doyle v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER DOYLE, LPC, LCPC Individually and on behalf of his clients
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, in his official capacity and LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor of the State of Maryland, in his official capacity
Case Number: 19-2064
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 15, 2021 Summary Christopher Doyle, LPC v. Hogan

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 17 ]. Number of days granted: 1. Opening brief and appendix due 11/26/2019. Response brief due 12/26/2019. Copies to all parties. [1000634527] [19-2064] TW [Entered: 11/26/2019 02:52 PM]
November 26, 2019 Filing 17 MOTION by Christopher Doyle to extend filing time for appendix until November 26, 2019 nunc pro tunc (unopposed).. Date and method of service: 11/26/2019 ecf. [1000634414] [19-2064] Roger Gannam [Entered: 11/26/2019 01:41 PM]
November 26, 2019 Filing 16 Joint FULL ELECTRONIC APPENDIX and full paper appendix by Christopher Doyle. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date paper copies mailed dispatched or delivered to court: 11/26/2019. [1000633630] [19-2064] Roger Gannam [Entered: 11/26/2019 01:57 AM]
November 25, 2019 Filing 15 BRIEF by Christopher Doyle in electronic and paper format. Type of Brief: OPENING. Method of Filing Paper Copies: courier. Date Paper Copies Mailed, Dispatched, or Delivered to Court: 11/26/2019. [1000633627] [19-2064] Roger Gannam [Entered: 11/25/2019 11:33 PM]
October 17, 2019 Filing 14 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Horatio G. Mihet for Christopher Doyle. [1000609070] [19-2064] Daniel Schmid [Entered: 10/17/2019 11:57 PM]
October 16, 2019 Filing 13 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by John R. Garza for Christopher Doyle. [1000607331] [19-2064] John Garza [Entered: 10/16/2019 09:53 AM]
October 15, 2019 Filing 12 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Mathew Staver for Christopher Doyle. [1000607084] [19-2064] Mathew Staver [Entered: 10/15/2019 05:20 PM]
October 15, 2019 Filing 11 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Daniel J Schmid for Christopher Doyle. [1000607065] [19-2064] Daniel Schmid [Entered: 10/15/2019 04:50 PM]
October 15, 2019 Filing 10 BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Opening Brief and Appendix due 11/25/2019. Response Brief due 12/24/2019 [19-2064] RHS [Entered: 10/15/2019 03:39 PM]
October 15, 2019 Filing 9 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Christopher Doyle. [19-2064] Roger Gannam [Entered: 10/15/2019 03:07 PM]
October 15, 2019 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS by Christopher Doyle. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000606827] [19-2064] Roger Gannam [Entered: 10/15/2019 03:07 PM]
October 15, 2019 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Roger K. Gannam for Christopher Doyle. [1000606824] [19-2064] Roger Gannam [Entered: 10/15/2019 03:05 PM]
October 11, 2019 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Brett Emerson Felter for Brian E. Frosh and Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr.. [1000605792] [19-2064] Brett Felter [Entered: 10/11/2019 03:02 PM]
October 11, 2019 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS by Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr.. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000605703] [19-2064] Kathleen Ellis [Entered: 10/11/2019 02:03 PM]
October 11, 2019 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS by Brian E. Frosh. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000605699] [19-2064] Kathleen Ellis [Entered: 10/11/2019 02:02 PM]
October 11, 2019 Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Kathleen A. Ellis for Brian E. Frosh and Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr.. [1000605696] [19-2064] Kathleen Ellis [Entered: 10/11/2019 02:00 PM]
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00190-DKC.. [19-2064] RHS [Entered: 10/01/2019 11:57 AM]
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00190-DKC. Case manager: RSewell. [19-2064] RHS [Entered: 10/01/2019 11:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Doyle v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTOPHER DOYLE, LPC, LCPC Individually and on behalf of his clients
Represented By: John Ray Garza
Represented By: Mathew D. Staver
Represented By: Horatio Gabriel Mihet Esq.
Represented By: Roger Karam Gannam
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Schmid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, in his official capacity
Represented By: Kathleen A. Ellis
Represented By: Brett Emerson Felter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor of the State of Maryland, in his official capacity
Represented By: Kathleen A. Ellis
Represented By: Brett Emerson Felter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?