In re: Edward Jeffus
| In re: EDWARD DANE JEFFUS |
| 19-2098 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER filed [1000603350] deferring action on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Edward Dane Jeffus [4]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Edward Dane Jeffus. [19-2098] EB [Entered: 10/08/2019 04:39 PM]
|
| Filing 4 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Edward Dane Jeffus. [19-2098] EB [Entered: 10/08/2019 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00910-NCT-JEP. Mailed to: Edward Dane Jeffus. [19-2098] EB [Entered: 10/08/2019 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Edward Dane Jeffus. [19-2098] EB [Entered: 10/08/2019 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00910-NCT-JEP. Case manager: EBorneisen. [19-2098] EB [Entered: 10/08/2019 04:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Edward Jeffus | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: EDWARD DANE JEFFUS | |
| Represented By: | Edward Dane Jeffus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
