Akeda Pearson v. Board of Education
ARLEN LIVERMAN, Deputy Superintendent and GEORGE ARLOTTO, Chief of Staff |
MAMIE PERKINS, Interim Superintendent, in her official capacity and BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY |
DR. AKEDA PEARSON |
19-2121 |
October 15, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Akeda Pearson v. Board of Education |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Board of Education of Anne Arundel County and Mamie Perkins. [19-2121] Kemp Hammond [Entered: 11/20/2019 12:48 PM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Kemp W. Hammond for Board of Education of Anne Arundel County and Mamie Perkins. [1000629734] [19-2121] Kemp Hammond [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:34 AM] |
Filing 8 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Akeda Pearson. [19-2121] MR [Entered: 11/21/2019 10:08 AM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-02358-CCB. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-2121] MR [Entered: 11/07/2019 01:23 PM] |
Filing 4 RECORD FOLLOW UP NOTICE ISSUED to Clerk of Court. 11/13/2019 [19-2121] MR [Entered: 10/30/2019 08:57 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 11/08/2019 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-2121] MR [Entered: 10/15/2019 08:55 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 10/29/2019. [19-2121] MR [Entered: 10/15/2019 08:53 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-02358-CCB. Case manager: MRadday. [19-2121] MR [Entered: 10/15/2019 08:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.