In re: Tony Smith
Petitioner: In re: TONY BRYAN SMITH
Case Number: 19-370
Filed: September 17, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2019 Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)) Mailed to: Tony Smith. [19-370] KH [Entered: 09/17/2019 02:48 PM]
September 17, 2019 Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Case manager: KHancock. [19-370] KH [Entered: 09/17/2019 02:30 PM]
September 16, 2019 Filing 3 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Tony Bryan Smith. [19-370] KH [Entered: 09/17/2019 02:47 PM]
September 16, 2019 Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Tony Bryan Smith. Is PSR available on district court docket? NA. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? NA. [19-370] KH [Entered: 09/17/2019 02:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Tony Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: TONY BRYAN SMITH
Represented By: Tony Bryan Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?