US v. Thomas Gillen
THOMAS WALTER GILLEN |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-4553 |
July 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Thomas Walter Gillen. [19-4553] David Eustis [Entered: 07/31/2019 02:37 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Raymond C. Tarlton for Michael Paul Miselis in 19-4550. [1000557665] [19-4550, 19-4551, 19-4553] Raymond Tarlton [Entered: 07/31/2019 11:31 AM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David A. Eustis for Thomas Walter Gillen. [1000557388] [19-4553] David Eustis [Entered: 07/31/2019 08:39 AM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Lisa M. Lorish for Benjamin Drake Daley in 19-4551. [1000557387] [19-4551, 19-4550, 19-4553] Lisa Lorish [Entered: 07/31/2019 08:38 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER filed [1000557160] consolidating case 19-4551, 19-4553 with 19-4550. Copies to all parties. [19-4550, 19-4551, 19-4553] JSN [Entered: 07/30/2019 04:13 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Laura Day Rottenborn for US. [1000557049] [19-4553] Laura Rottenborn [Entered: 07/30/2019 03:21 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] criminal case. Originating case number: 3:18-cr-00025-NKM-JCH-3. [19-4553] CP [Entered: 07/30/2019 01:10 PM] |
Filing 2 ORDER filed [1000556858] appointing/assigning counsel. David Anthony Eustis for Thomas Walter Gillen in 19-4553. Nunc pro Tunc Date: 07/30/2019. Copies to all parties. [19-4553] CP [Entered: 07/30/2019 01:06 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 3:18-cr-00025-NKM-JCH-3. Date notice of appeal filed: 07/30/2019. Case manager: CPoulsen. [19-4553] CP [Entered: 07/30/2019 01:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.