US v. Jovan Lee
JOVAN LEE |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-4634 |
September 4, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Mr. Russell Anthony Neverdon, Sr. - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 09/19/2019. Originating case number: 1:18-cr-00544-RDB-1. [19-4634] CH [Entered: 09/04/2019 04:00 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cr-00544-RDB-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/21/2019. Case manager: CHalupa. [19-4634] CH [Entered: 09/04/2019 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Jovan Lee | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JOVAN LEE | |
Represented By: | Russell Anthony Neverdon Sr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | James G. Warwick Esq. |
Represented By: | Joan Castleton Mathias |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.