US v. Montez Allen
Defendant / Appellant: MONTEZ LAMAR ALLEN, a/k/a Doc Milla
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-4645
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2019 Filing 8 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Montez Lamar Allen in 19-4645 to notice requesting response [ # 1000583083-2 ], Motion to accelerate case processing [ # 1000583067-2 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [19-4609, 19-4645, 19-4646] Seth Weston [Entered: 09/10/2019 05:18 PM]
September 10, 2019 Filing 7 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Javontay Jacquis Holland in 19-4609, 19-4646 to Motion to accelerate case processing [ # 1000583067-2 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [19-4609, 19-4645, 19-4646] Jacqueline Reiner [Entered: 09/10/2019 04:06 PM]
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER filed [1000583982] consolidating case 19-4646 with 19-4609(L). Cross-appeal appellant: United States of America. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Michael James Newman. [19-4609, 19-4645, 19-4646] EB [Entered: 09/09/2019 03:48 PM]
September 9, 2019 Filing 5 Transcript deadline created for cross appeal 19-4645 for Mary Butenschoen. Originating Case No: 4:18-cr-00012-MFU-RSB-4. Transcript due from Mary Butenschoen, Official Court Reporter 10/15/2019. [19-4645] EB [Entered: 09/09/2019 02:43 PM]
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER filed [1000583828] consolidating case 19-4645 with 19-4609(L). Cross-appeal appellant: United States of America. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Michael James Newman. [19-4609, 19-4645] EB [Entered: 09/09/2019 02:37 PM]
September 9, 2019 Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] criminal case. Originating case number: 4:18-cr-00012-MFU-RSB-4. Mailed to: Michael James Newman. [19-4645] EB [Entered: 09/09/2019 02:34 PM]
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER filed [1000583815] appointing/assigning counsel. Neil Anderson Horn as lead counsel and Seth Christopher Weston as co-counsel for Montez Lamar Allen in 19-4645. Nunc pro Tunc Date: 08/30/2019. Copies to all parties. Nunc pro Tunc Date: 08/30/2019. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Michael James Newman. [19-4645] EB [Entered: 09/09/2019 02:32 PM]
September 9, 2019 Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 4:18-cr-00012-MFU-RSB-4. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/30/2019. Case manager: EBorneisen. [19-4645] EB [Entered: 09/09/2019 02:25 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Montez Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: MONTEZ LAMAR ALLEN, a/k/a Doc Milla
Represented By: Seth C. Weston
Represented By: Neil Anderson Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Heather Lynn Carlton
Represented By: Laura Day Rottenborn
Represented By: Michael James Newman
Represented By: Michael Andrew Baudinet
Represented By: Ronald Mitchell Huber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?