In Re: David Williams
In re: DAVID WILLIAMS |
19-469 |
December 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Docket correction requested from David Williams. Mailed to: D. Williams. [19-469] --[Edited 12/11/2019 by CT, sent to FCI Fort Dix] CT [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:22 PM] |
Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [1] 2244 case. Originating case number: 7:14-cr-00103-FL-1. Mailed to: D. Williams. [19-469]--[Edited 12/11/2019 by CT, sent to FCI Fort Dix] CT [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:20 PM] |
Filing 3 PARTIAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 12/16/2019 [19-469] CT [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:15 PM] |
Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by David Williams. Is PSR available on district court docket? Y. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? N. [19-469] CT [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:14 PM] |
Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 7:14-cr-00103-FL-1. Case manager: CathyHerb. [19-469] CT [Entered: 12/11/2019 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In Re: David Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: DAVID WILLIAMS | |
Represented By: | David Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.