US v. Jamar Johnson
JAMAR JOHNSON |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-4890 |
December 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Mr. Jonathan McKey Milling - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 12/20/2019. Originating case number: 3:18-cr-00743-TLW-1. [19-4890] JSN [Entered: 12/05/2019 09:38 AM] |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 3:18-cr-00743-TLW-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 12/02/2019. Case manager: JeffNeal. [19-4890] JSN [Entered: 12/05/2019 09:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Jamar Johnson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JAMAR JOHNSON | |
Represented By: | Jonathan McKey Milling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Anne Hunter Young |
Represented By: | John C. Potterfield |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.