Jermaine Harris v. Stephen Moyer
JERMAINE D. HARRIS |
FRANK B. BISHOP, Warden of the North Branch Correctional Institution, STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary, Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND and WAYNE WEBB, Commissioner, Maryland Department of Corrections |
19-6119 |
January 22, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Amended MOTION by Jermaine D. Harris for certificate of appealability. Date and method of service: 02/08/2019 US mail. [1000455504] [19-6119] DL [Entered: 02/11/2019 02:43 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03745-TDC. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [19-6119] TF [Entered: 01/24/2019 09:43 AM] |
Filing 4 FEE NOTICE issued to Erek Lawrence Barron - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 02/21/2019 Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03745-TDC. Mailed to: Harris. [19-6119] TF [Entered: 01/22/2019 12:54 PM] |
Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 02/05/2019. [19-6119] TF [Entered: 01/22/2019 12:46 PM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03745-TDC. Date notice of appeal filed: 01/17/2019. Case manager: TFischer. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-6119] TF [Entered: 01/22/2019 12:02 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION by Jermaine D. Harris for certificate of appealability. [1000442427] [19-6119] TF [Entered: 01/22/2019 12:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.