Ronald McClary v. Officer Holder
| RONALD MCCLARY |
| OFFICER JOYNER, ROBERT BURGESS, OFFICER HOLDER, RODERICK WATSON, NURSE FULLER and DENNIS DANIELS |
| 19-6125 |
| January 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Ronald McClary re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Ronald McClary SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 22385 McGirts Bridge Road Laurinburg, NC 28353. [19-6125] AB [Entered: 02/22/2019 06:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Ronald McClary SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 22385 McGirts Bridge Road Laurinburg, NC 28353. Informal Opening Brief due 02/19/2019. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief filed. [19-6125] AB [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Ronald McClary ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Ronald McClary SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 22385 McGirts Bridge Road Laurinburg, NC 28353. [19-6125] AB [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03051-FL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6125] AB [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03051-FL. Case manager: ABrownlee. [19-6125] AB [Entered: 01/23/2019 09:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
