Dedric Sherrod v. Harold Clarke
| SIR HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
| DEDRIC DEVON SHERROD |
| 19-6162 |
| January 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER filed [1000482139] deferring action on application to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Dedric Devon Sherrod [9] Copies to all parties.. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 03/26/2019 01:33 PM]
|
| Filing 10 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Dedric Devon Sherrod. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 03/26/2019 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 9 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Dedric Devon Sherrod. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 03/26/2019 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 03/18/2019 10:56 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER filed [1000469749] granting motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ]. Number of days granted: 14. Fee/IFP/CJA 23 due 03/19/2019 and Informal Opening Brief due 03/19/2019. Copies to all parties. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 03/05/2019 10:46 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Dedric Devon Sherrod to extend filing time for filing of informal brief and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by a period of 14 days.. Date and method of service: 02/25/2019 US mail. [1000469741] [19-6162] MR [Entered: 03/05/2019 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed (pleading #27 only). Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 03/01/2019 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 02/25/2019 [19-6162] MR [Entered: 01/31/2019 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Dedric Devon Sherrod - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 03/04/2019 Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00174-RBS-RJK.. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 01/31/2019 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00174-RBS-RJK. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?No [19-6162] MR [Entered: 01/31/2019 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00174-RBS-RJK. Date notice of appeal filed: 01/28/2019. Case manager: MRadday. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-6162] MR [Entered: 01/31/2019 08:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dedric Sherrod v. Harold Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SIR HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Leah A. Darron Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DEDRIC DEVON SHERROD | |
| Represented By: | Dedric Devon Sherrod |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
