David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
| DAVID MEYERS |
| DIRECTOR HAROLD CLARKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT BIG STONE GAP DIVISION, CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE JAMES N. ISHIDA, JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF FOURTH CIRCUIT and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ABINGDON DIVISION |
| 19-6175 |
| February 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00460-MFU-RSB. Mailed to: David Meyers. [19-6175] KS [Entered: 03/27/2019 04:38 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed [1000483330] dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David Meyers. [19-6175] KS [Entered: 03/27/2019 04:36 PM]
|
| Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Meyers re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [19-6175] KS [Entered: 02/25/2019 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00460-MFU-RSB. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6175] KS [Entered: 02/04/2019 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Meyers ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [19-6175] KS [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00460-MFU-RSB. Case manager: KStump. [19-6175] KS [Entered: 02/01/2019 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
