Javon Martin v. Harold Clarke
BARRY KANOKE, Warden, River North Correctional Center |
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
JAVON LAREN MARTIN |
19-6210 |
February 8, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER filed [1000472197] deferring action on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Javon Laren Martin [6]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Javon Martin. [19-6210] CB [Entered: 03/07/2019 03:34 PM] |
Filing 6 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Javon Laren Martin. [19-6210] CB [Entered: 03/07/2019 03:32 PM] |
Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Javon Laren Martin. [19-6210] CB [Entered: 03/07/2019 03:32 PM] |
Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00111-DEM. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [19-6210] CB [Entered: 02/08/2019 03:11 PM] |
Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Javon Laren Martin - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 03/11/2019. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00111-DEM. Mailed to: Javon Martin. [19-6210] CB [Entered: 02/08/2019 03:06 PM] |
Filing 2 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Javon Martin. Informal Opening Brief due 03/04/2019. [19-6210] CB [Entered: 02/08/2019 03:03 PM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00111-DEM. Date notice of appeal filed: 02/04/2019. Case manager: CBennett. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-6210] CB [Entered: 02/08/2019 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.