Robert Smith v. Superintendant Hackworth
ROBERT EARL SMITH |
SUPERINTENDANT HACKWORTH |
19-6240 |
February 14, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Robert Smith v. Superintendant Hackworth |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Returned mail received from Robert Earl Smith re. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? None. Address already updated. [1000488516] [19-6240] JR [Entered: 04/05/2019 02:50 PM] |
Filing 12 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Robert Earl Smith. [19-6240] JR [Entered: 04/03/2019 01:42 PM] |
Filing 11 DOCUMENT referencing [ # 9 ] informal opening brief , [8] Motion to proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Earl Smith. [1000481774] [19-6240] JR [Entered: 03/26/2019 09:38 AM] |
Filing 10 DOCUMENT referencing [ # 9 ] informal opening brief , [8] Motion to proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Earl Smith. [1000479844] [19-6240] JR [Entered: 03/21/2019 03:58 PM] |
Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Robert Earl Smith. [19-6240] JR [Entered: 03/14/2019 01:31 PM] |
Filing 8 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Robert Earl Smith. [19-6240] JR [Entered: 03/14/2019 01:30 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER filed [1000466161] granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ]. Number of days granted: 21. Informal Opening Brief due 04/08/2019, Fee/IFP/CJA 23 due 04/08/2019. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Robert Smith. [19-6240] JR [Entered: 02/27/2019 12:23 PM] |
Filing 6 MOTION by Robert Earl Smith to extend filing time for informal opening brief and application to proceed in forma pauperis. Date and method of service: 02/24/2019 US mail. [1000466159] [19-6240] JR [Entered: 02/27/2019 12:21 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01449-CMH-JFA. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [19-6240] JR [Entered: 02/15/2019 08:43 AM] |
Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 02/28/2019. [19-6240] JR [Entered: 02/14/2019 03:54 PM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Robert Earl Smith. Informal Opening Brief due 03/11/2019 [19-6240] JR [Entered: 02/14/2019 03:49 PM] |
Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Robert Earl Smith - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 03/18/2019. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01449-CMH-JFA. Mailed to: Robert Earl Smith. [19-6240] JR [Entered: 02/14/2019 03:48 PM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01449-CMH-JFA. Date notice of appeal filed: 02/13/2019. Case manager: JRice. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-6240] JR [Entered: 02/14/2019 03:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Robert Smith v. Superintendant Hackworth | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT EARL SMITH | |
Represented By: | Robert Earl Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: SUPERINTENDANT HACKWORTH | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.