US v. Daniel Watlington
| DANIEL WATLINGTON, a/k/a Gator Slim |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-6400 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER filed [1000494736] denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [7]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Daniel Watlington. [19-6400] RE [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:49 PM]
|
| Filing 7 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Daniel Watlington. [19-6400] RE [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Daniel Watlington. [19-6400] RE [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 SEALED district court document (court access only). Description of document: Presentence Report. Originating case number: 5:05-cr-00004-BO-1,5:19-cv-00086-BO. [19-6400] RE [Entered: 03/28/2019 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:05-cr-00004-BO-1,5:19-cv-00086-BO. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? No. [19-6400] RE [Entered: 03/28/2019 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Daniel Watlington. Informal Opening Brief due 04/19/2019. [19-6400] RE [Entered: 03/26/2019 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 2255 case docketed. Originating case number: 5:05-cr-00004-BO-1,5:19-cv-00086-BO. Date notice of appeal filed: 03/22/2019. Case manager: REdwards. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-6400] RE [Entered: 03/26/2019 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
