Christopher Tessinger v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
| WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG |
| CHRISTOPHER ADAM TESSINGER |
| 19-6462 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Christopher Tessigner v. Warden FCI Williamsburg |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER filed [1000518145] granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 06/24/2019. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Christopher Adam Tessinger. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:34 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION by Christopher Adam Tessinger to extend filing time for informal opening brief. [1000518139] [19-6462] EB [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:33 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER filed [1000518137] deferring action on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Christopher Adam Tessinger [7]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Christopher Adam Tessinger. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:31 PM]
|
| Filing 7 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Christopher Adam Tessinger. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Christopher Adam Tessinger re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Christopher Adam Tessinger. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 05/13/2019 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Marshall Prince for Warden FCI Williamsburg. [1000502347] [19-6462] Marshall Prince [Entered: 04/29/2019 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:18-cv-00157-JFA. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Christopher Adam Tessinger. Informal Opening Brief due 05/06/2019. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Christopher Adam Tessinger - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 05/10/2019. Originating case number: 8:18-cv-00157-JFA. Mailed to: Christopher Adam Tessinger. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 8:18-cv-00157-JFA. Date notice of appeal filed: 04/08/2019. Case manager: EBorneisen. Did district court rule on COA? N/A. [19-6462] EB [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Christopher Tessinger v. Warden FCI Williamsburg | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG | |
| Represented By: | Marshall Prince II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CHRISTOPHER ADAM TESSINGER | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Adam Tessinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
