William Carawan, Jr. v. George Solomon
| GEORGE SOLOMON, BRAD PERRITT, LARRY THOMPSON, MARCUS HOVIS, CLAYTON BREWER, CORY COLLINS and GEORGE P. NOLAN |
| WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR. |
| 19-6467 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03226-FL. Mailed to: William Carawan, Jr. [19-6467] TW [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:51 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed [1000501648] granting motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [ # 5 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: William Carawan, Jr. [19-6467] TW [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by William Carawan, Jr. to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [5]. Date and method of service: 04/22/2019 US mail. [1000501012] [19-6467] CT [Entered: 04/25/2019 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03226-FL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6467] CT [Entered: 04/10/2019 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 05/06/2019. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-6467] CT [Entered: 04/10/2019 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ William Carawan, Jr. ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: W. Carawan, Jr.. [19-6467] CT [Entered: 04/10/2019 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03226-FL. Case manager: CathyHerb. [19-6467] CT [Entered: 04/10/2019 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
