Raymond Griffin v. Lorrin Freeman
| LORRIN FREEMAN and DONNIE HARRISON |
| RAYMOND GRIFFIN and RAYMOND ALAN GRIFFIN |
| 19-6490 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Raymond Alan Griffin re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days.. [19-6490] MR [Entered: 05/22/2019 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 6 Letter re: proceedings ongoing in district court by Raymond Alan Griffin . [1000517174] [19-6490] MR [Entered: 05/22/2019 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-hc-02060-BO. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [19-6490] MR [Entered: 04/16/2019 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 05/09/2019 [19-6490] MR [Entered: 04/15/2019 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Raymond Griffin - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 05/15/2019 Originating case number: 5:18-hc-02060-BO.. [19-6490] MR [Entered: 04/15/2019 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 04/29/2019. [19-6490] MR [Entered: 04/15/2019 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-hc-02060-BO. Date notice of appeal filed: 03/18/2019. Case manager: MRadday. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-6490] MR [Entered: 04/15/2019 08:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
