William Couch v. Harold Clarke
A. DAVID ROBINSON, HAROLD CLARKE, JOHN A. WOODSON and LYNN GRAHAM |
WILLIAM R. COUCH and SCOTT M. BOGER |
19-6526 |
April 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES by Scott M. Boger and William R. Couch. [1000520606] . [19-6526] RE [Entered: 05/29/2019 11:46 AM] |
Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by William R. Couch. [19-6526] RE [Entered: 05/02/2019 01:50 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00049-JPJ-PMS. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6526] RE [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:43 AM] |
Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: William Couch and Scott Boger. Informal Opening Brief due 05/17/2019. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-6526] RE [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:40 AM] |
Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Scott M. Boger - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 05/23/2019 Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00049-JPJ-PMS. Mailed to: William Couch and Scott Boger. [19-6526] RE [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:39 AM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ William R. Couch ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: William Couch and Scott Boger. [19-6526] RE [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:36 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00049-JPJ-PMS. Case manager: REdwards. [19-6526] RE [Entered: 04/23/2019 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.